River Town: Two Years on the Yangtze
by Peter Hessler
Reviewed by Patrick Lloyd Hatcher
In 1996 Peter Hessler arrived in China ready to teach
English literature at the Fuling Teachers College and to learn about
Chinese life. River Town: Two Years on the Yangtze, winner of
the Kiriyama Prize for nonfiction in 2001, celebrates both accomplishments.
It also serves as proof that the Peace Corps has had a positive impact.
In clear, succinct prose, Hessler details a little-known part of China
in the province of Sichuan and wisely allows his students to carry
much of the narrative in their raw and original yet romantic voices.
Attendance at Fuling Teachers College for each student
meant a new beginning. They were not afraid of hard work, knowing that "the
most difficult literature assignment was preferable to wading knee-deep
in muck behind a water buffalo." Children of poor peasants, most
of their grandmothers had had bound feet and few of their grandfathers
had been able to read. They had struggled to win a chance at the life
of the mind, an opportunity for their imaginations to soar. Above the
banks of the Yangtze, they learn about Shakespeare, putting all their
pent up energy into classroom productions of Romeo and Juliet and Hamlet.
With utmost tenderness, Hessler captures a Chinese Horatio cradling
a dying Hamlet, saying softly, sadly, "Good night, sweet prince,
And flights of angels sing thee to thy rest." Acted on the floor
of a cheerless Chinese classroom, the reader is brought up short by
how beautiful the scene is.
Hessler quickly learns that his students also sing
and recite poetry as part of their lives. Every one of his Fuling students
could recite at least a dozen Chinese classics by heart. When he assigned
what he thought was a difficult Shakespeare sonnet, they scanned its
rhythm, softly beating time on their desks. They "heard" the
sonnet, they recognized its music. They could take the first line —"Shall
I compare thee to a summer's day?" —and compose a short
paragraph describing the subject. In Hessler's classroom her loveliness
came alive again, often transformed into a Tang dynasty beauty.
Or take the story of Robin Hood of Sichuan Forest.
Chinese colleges have two purposes: to teach and to indoctrinate. Politics
pushed the party line. In Fuling some students saw Robin Hood as an
early Mao Zedong, a revolutionary against injustice. Others saw him
as a counterrevolutionary, the sort of person who would stir up trouble
and disturb the economy. Hessler understood the confusion in his students
when they forced literature into a framework of historical materialism
or socialism with Chinese characteristics. He had gone through the
same "hopeless mess" at Princeton and Oxford trying to satisfy
English professors who wanted students to force their views through
the stiff academic lenses of deconstructionism, post-modernism, or
new historicism.
Away from literature, Hessler jogs, joining a local
race, which he wins. He has less success at basketball; Chinese referees
insist he double dribbles. He worries about the gigantic Three Gorges
Dam on the Yangtze; part of Fuling will be lost in the rising waters.
But he is met by a sense of fatalism on the part of his students and
colleagues. His frustration over learning the language gives way to
hard work, which wins him his fluency, character by character. With
fluency he learns patience; Mandarin is the language of the north and
the elite. Elsewhere in China local dialects defeat him, but he never
despairs as he learns more about himself through his Chinese experience.
He doesn't suffer alone; the Peace Corps had assigned two teachers
to Fuling so he has a buddy, Adam Meir. Together they survive faculty
banquets where drinking toasts have drowned many careers.
More than anything, this book bridges the Pacific,
helping two giant societies, American and Chinese, understand better
the strains that life imposes and offers two of the world's newest
and oldest nations. What a joy to read.


 |
 |

|